Reading through a local blog by a locally famous writer, it didn’t occur to me to see the writing as offensive or directed toward anyone in a particularly inappropriate way. Dave Scott writes in an aggressive style I probably couldn’t pull off, but usually leaves me laughing by the end of his post/rant/editorial. Today’s post began with his opinions on local politics and issues, but ended with a pretty humorous joke about a cannon, adoption agency and a child. No one should take offense and most of his writing covers local interest, with an overly honest opinion from Dave. Does it trample roughshod over ego? Sure, but the point of his blog is to express his unfiltered opinions. I don’t always agree, but he does seem to find the key polarizing issue and problem. Dave Scott Blog
I would recommend a quick look and reading through more than the parts of each post you might find offensive. If you find yourself leaving with hurt feelings, you might want to reconsider how sanitized your news might be in the rest of your day. News and editorials aren’t supposed to agree with every opinion you might have. We need grumpy, annoyed, unfiltered writing and reporting. In my opinion, the more a writer stirs up discussion and the more you find yourself thinking, the better. Dave, I like to think of as a friend. He thinks a great deal about local issues and, while he sometimes chooses a less politically correct way to cover the story, he creates discussion by finding the heart of the issue. Is the airport terminal a success or example of waste? Why isn’t the marina running and operating, after 2 years? Is the commission doing a good job? Does Dave like the commissioners? Do we like the commissioners? Should local politicians weigh in on national issues beyond the scope of local office? I don’t find anything he writes offensive, but then think about the absurdity of finding offense with anything you choose to read.
Thinking of absurdity, I manage a local’s group with a focus on promoting “ON ISLAND” business. The rules, yes rules, center around being positive, using real identities and encouraging discussions to reflect the opinions of real locals. Amazing at times, after asking members to read rules and even indicating that agreement in writing, I’m deleting a member every few days for repeatedly ignoring the rules. Regardless, the insisting on civility and using a real identity is, in my opinion, doing more to keep the space productive. I don’t much like the term “safe space”, but “civil space” and discussions make it a great place to talk. 🏝 Amelia Island Local Net I know, the name is an intentional mirror of this website. In using social media, I wanted to have a way to publish from a blog, but also create a positive forum for locals.
This is, apparently, my week to learn about my frequent typing errors and “obvious to anyone” signs I’m older than 40. Do you use two spaces after a “period” or punctuation at end of sentence? I’m so accustomed to the double space, it never occurred to me to question. Letters, once about as common as an email for me, are now once a year and the spacing I use in typing is left over from time with a manual typewriter in the 70’s. I’ll break the habit in a few weeks, but that extra space and knowing it dates every online communication, is reason enough to erase the habit.
But one rule from typing class has definitely expired, and if you’re over 40, it’s possible that no one has given you the message. Here it is:
Unless you are typing on an actual typewriter, you no longer have to put two spaces after a period. Cult of Pedagogy 3/9/18